Cloud Recovery

Thoughts and Topics Around Cloud Backup and Recovery

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 4 other followers

  • Subscribe

  • RSS Cloud Security

    • GoGrid Security Breach
      Bad news for GoGrid customers as today we received the following breach notification by email… Dear Valued Customer: In the normal process of reviewing our system activity, our Security Team discovered that an unauthorized third party may have viewed your account information, including payment card data. We immediately took action to protect our custom […]
  • RSS Cloud Computing Journal

    • Cloud Expo New York Speaker Profile: Chris MacGown – Piston Cloud Computing
      With Cloud Expo 2012 New York (10th Cloud Expo) now less than three three weeks away, what better time to start introducing you in greater detail to the distinguished individuals in our incredible Speaker Faculty for the technical and strategy sessions at the conference... We have technical and strategy sessions for you every day from June 11 through June 14 […]

Posts Tagged ‘cloud backup and recovery’

Storage Industry Group Starts New Cloud Backup-Recovery SIG

Posted by brennels on July 26, 2010

By: Chris Preimesberger http://www.eweek.com  2010-07-21

The Cloud BUR [Back Up and Restore] SIG is a project of SNIA’s Cloud Storage Initiative that promotes the adoption of cloud storage as a delivery model that provides on-demand storage billed only for what is used.

Nobody doubts that there is a lot more education to do in all business markets about the intricacies and attributes of cloud data backup/restore, archiving and disaster recovery.

So an influential industry group, the Storage Networking Industry Association, took it upon itself July 21 to form a new Cloud Backup and Restore Special Interest Group to approach this problem.

The Cloud BUR [Back Up and Restore] SIG is a project of SNIA’s Cloud Storage Initiative that promotes the adoption of cloud storage as a model that provides on-demand storage billed only for what is used. Its main role is to educate the market about Cloud BUR benefits through use cases and to define requirements for future standards.”

Read the rest of the article here on eweek.com
 

Posted in Backup and Recovery, Cloud Backup, Cloud Recovery, Server Recovery | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Double-Take 101: Nope, we are not a cloud provider

Posted by brennels on June 28, 2010

Posted on http://userblog.doubletake.com/June 21, 2010 by miketalonnyc | Edit

“Ever since the introduction of Double-Take Cloud, we’ve been getting a lot of questions as to how our cloud systems are configured, where they are hosted, what type of VM hosts we’re running, etc. I thought it would be good to do a DT: 101 article on the fact that Double-Take Software is not, in fact, a cloud provider of any kind – which is saying a lot these days.

Everyone from Oracle to EMC is re-branding themselves as a “cloud company,” and for the most part they’re right on the money. Oracle has been offering Software as a Service (SaaS) for quite some time now, and EMC is a great platform to build a private cloud on (as are any of the other mass-storage providers). But this rush to re-brand as cloud companies can be confusing, especially when companies that make cloud-enabling technology (like Double-Take Cloud) can get muddled in with the cloud infrastructure providers.

So, for the record, Double-Take Software is not a cloud company. We do not host servers for Infrastructure on Demand, nor do we provide SaaS solutions, though Double-Take Cloud is pretty close to that last definition. What we are is a software company that makes quite a few technologies that can effectively power your cloud ambitions, and are used by many cloud companies as well.”

Read the rest of the article here http://userblog.doubletake.com/2010/06/21/double-take-101-nope-we-are-not-a-cloud-provider/

Posted in Business Continuity, Cloud Availability, Cloud Recovery, RaaS | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Double-Take Cloud: Disaster Recovery Using Amazon Web Services

Posted by brennels on March 11, 2010

From Enterprise Systems Journal: Double-Take Software’s system state replication engine creates full image of a server workload in the cloud for rapid recovery

Note: ESJ’s editors carefully choose vendor-issued press releases about new or upgraded products and services. We have edited and/or condensed this release to highlight key features but make no claims as to the accuracy of the vendor’s statements.

Double-Take Software has leveraged Amazon Web Services to create a real-time workload recovery platform, Double-Take Cloud, to protect businesses from disaster and keep companies up and running without any upfront costs. Double-Take Cloud leverages the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2).

Traditional disaster recovery solutions are often reserved for those companies that can afford to build and manage a second data center, complete with back-up servers standing by in case of a disaster or outage — a costly practice that requires significant resources. Other IT departments rely solely on the capabilities of local tape backup, also a time-consuming process with limited recovery capabilities.

Posted in Amazon, Backup and Recovery, Cloud Recovery, RaaS | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

It’s the Recovery Stupid!

Posted by brennels on February 24, 2010

In the early 1990′s the then administration had intense discussions about what was important to economy and the phrase “It’s the Economy Stupid!” came to light and ultimately helped win the election in 1992. I was thinking about this the other day and realized this same phrase applies to server backup and recovery, then realized that it isn’t the backup that is important but more so the ability to recover. IT managers ever day perform backups to protect data, servers, applications in the event the need is to recover those systems but just because there is a duplicate copy never ensures the ability to recover that copy of the server workload in a timely manner. This is where many cloud providers as well as storage vendors may be making the same past mistakes utilizing proprietary solutions only between like hardware or infrastructure.

 Just because data may be backed up to tape, disk, a data center or cloud computing infrastructure never guarantees the ability that it can be recovered quickly and efficiently to a new server or virtual machine. In fact, many pains IT managers face is that backups can’t be recovered to dissimilar hardware. If you have a backup of a HP or IBM blade, what are the changes of being able to restore that to a Dell PowerEdge. Probably not good! The challenge is the inoperability of compatible drivers and or hardware and not to mention licensing of recovering that workload to a new or different server that may be available.

Cloud backup and recovery solutions solve much of these issues. Virtualization certainly can add level of complexity to the situation but also greatly helps solve many of these issues. The great thing about being able to backup and recover to a virtual cloud platform as there is no need to care what the server is, just that there is the ability to spin up the virtual machine in the event of a failure and access the workload from the cloud. This is rapidly becoming the 4th dimension of cloud computing  platforms, “recovery as a service” in addition to Paas, IaaS, and SaaS.

So just because you have a backup when was the last time there was an attempt to recover? Focusing on improving the speed and efficiency of the recovery process will be better spent than just throwing in another tape to make you feel good. This will also ensure when there is a disaster event there isn’t a scramble to find the latest backup because the recovery procedures have been well exercised and streamlined to bring business operations into production with minimal downtime. Improving recovery will not only let you sleep well at night but will make you a rock star when you can quickly bring workloads online and prove to your executive team everything is under control. So, it isn’t just about the backup it’s the recovery!

Posted in Backup and Recovery, Business Continuity, Cloud Recovery, RaaS | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Is over-capacity inevitable in cloud computing?

Posted by amcanty on January 22, 2010

Posted by Alessandro Perilli   |   Thursday, January 21, 2010  

A lot of discussion is going on these days around some performance issues that Amazon customers are suffering with the Elastic Computing Cloud (EC2).

The discussion was triggered by Alan Williamson, a prominent voice in the Java community, who posted an interesting description of his 3-years experience with EC2. 
Williamson suggests that Amazon is allowing EC2 over-subscription at the point that the cloud is so crowded to generate some serious latency in the internal network, which impacts on the performance of any multi-tier application that resides on multiple virtual machines.

Another Amazon customer, David Mok, CTO at OleOle.com, suggests instead that the overall performance degradation depends on some differences (the CPU) in the physical hardware that is below the cloud, and that the cloud platform, the Amazon implementation of Xen, is incapable to fully abstract.

Christopher Hoff, former Chief Security Architect at Unisys and now Director of Cloud and Virtualization Solutions at Cisco, jumps in to comment the whole thing.
His very interesting point is that over-subscription is perfectly normal – modern networks are designed around such model – while over-capacity is an issue that we are going to have with cloud computing as much as we already have it with telecom networks.

He goes one highlighting that at today in cloud computing there’s nothing like a throughput SLA because:

…Your virtual interface ultimately is bundled together in aggregate with other tenants colocated on the same physical host and competes for a share of pipe (usually one or more single or trunked 1Gb/s or 10Gb/s Ethernet.) Network traffic in terms of measurement, capacity planning and usage must take into consideration the facts that it is both asymmetric, suffers from variability in bucket size, and is very, very bursty.

This complicates things when you consider that at this point scaling out in CPU is easier to do than scaling out in the network.  Add virtualization into the mix which drives big, flat, L2 networks as a design architecture layered with a control plane that is now (in the case of Cloud) mostly software driven, provisioned, orchestrated and implemented, and it’s no wonder that folks like Google, Amazon and Facebook are desparate for hugely dense, multi-terabit, wire speed L2 switching fabrics and could use 40 and 100Gb/s Ethernet today…

For the full article, click here!

Posted in Cloud Architecture, Cloud Availability, Cloud Computing, Cloud Providers | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Online back-up or cloud recovery?

Posted by amcanty on October 29, 2009

Author: Ian Masters
Posted: 16:27 28 Oct 2009

Backing up files and data online has been around for quite a while, but it has never really taken off in a big way for business customers. Now new solutions are coming to market that use “the cloud” for the backup and recovery of company data, but how do these differ to online backup and what can they offer? writes Ian Masters, UK sales and marketing director at Double-Take Software.

Cloud recovery” can be a nebulous term, so I would define it based on the solution having the following features:

1. The ability to recover workloads in the cloud

2. Effectively unlimited scalability with little or no up-front provisioning

3. Pay-per-use billing model

4. An infrastructure that is more secure and more reliable than the one you would build yourself

5. Complete protection – ie, non-expert users should be able to recover everything they need, by default.

If a solution does not meet these five criteria, then it should be called an online backup product.

There is an old saying in the data protection business that the whole point of backing up is preparing to restore. Having a backup copy of your data is important, but it takes more than a pile of tapes (or an online account) to restore. You might need a replacement server, new storage, and maybe even a new data centre, depending on what went wrong.

For the full article, click here!

Posted in Backup and Recovery, Cloud Computing, Cloud Recovery | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Cloud computing snafu deletes Microsoft Sidekick T-Mobile data

Posted by amcanty on October 13, 2009

October 12 2009 at 11:35 AM

“Eight hundred thousand T-Mobile subscribers who use Microsoft’s Danger Sidekick smart phones suffered the worst possible failure that can occur to anyone’s personal data. All the customers’ data – address books, calendars, to-do lists and photos was wiped out… kaput… gone… destroyed… forever and ever.

This computing nightmare affects not only Sidekick owners but everyone who owns a smart phone who now have to question the integrity of their own devices.

T-Mobile, the operator of the Sidekick’s data service and Microsoft fumble to explain how this massive clusterfoot happened.

T-Mobile’s web site explains:

Regrettably, based on Microsoft/Danger’s latest recovery assessment of their systems, we must now inform you that personal information stored on your device — such as contacts, calendar entries, to-do lists or photos — that is no longer on your Sidekick almost certainly has been lost as a result of a server failure at Microsoft/Danger. That said, our teams continue to work around-the-clock in hopes of discovering some way to recover this information. However, the likelihood of a successful outcome is extremely low… Sidekick users “NOT reset their device by removing the battery or letting their battery drain completely, as any personal content that currently resides on your device will be lost.”

The implication of the statement is Microsoft servers suffered a catastrophic failure and that there was no backup. How the f&^% is it possible there was no single backup on an enterprise so critical to the personal lives of tens of thousands of T-Mobile/Microsoft Sidekick users?

This isn’t the first time a Web service has crashed and left its users without access to data stored “in the cloud.” Google’s Gmail has had multiple outages but it has very quickly recovered with no data loss.

This is the FIRST TIME a MAJOR cloud-computing vendor didn’t have any backups. It is a total failure of systems from Microsoft’s server operating systems, storage systems, processes, procedures and everything that shoulda, woulda, coulda happened.

Folks, this is Microsoft we’re talking about here. It’s the same company who wants us to upgrade to Windows 7. It’s the company who wants to be your cloud computing company of choice. It’s the same company who sells server operating systems.

The blame is also being shared with Hitachi Data Systems who provided the failed backup systems. It is being reported Microsoft contracted Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) to do remedial work on the server infrastructure and that, during the work, the server infrastructure failed. There were no backups or replicated data sets and so the data was lost forever.

Further this involves a major telecommunications company – T-Mobile, not some small rural mobile phone provider. We need to understand so consumers know what to avoid in the future.

In every company I have ever worked in or consulted for, backing up is part of Information Technology 101. I always advocate not only one backup but sometimes double and triple backups and minimum 30-day archives. How can Microsoft, Hitachi and T-Mobile allow this massive failure?

Microsoft, Hitachi and T-Mobile must come clean and explain where and how the failures occurred lest they suffer the consequence of loosing the public and corporate enterprises’ trust. For now till they explain their names are all in the mud.

This is a complete failure. It would be a tough day to sell Microsoft server operating systems software today and even harder to sell Hitachi Data’s backup systems… unless Microsoft, Hitachi and T-Mobile comes clean and explains how this massive failure can happen. If I were a company chief information officer or chief information security officer, I would have to do a complete double-take before I commit to a server operating system or backup solution that can suffer such catastrophic failure.

The worst part of this (having owned a Sidekick) is there is NO EASY WAY to backup your Sidekick. It’s supposed to do it for you. This absolutely sucks for T-Mobile subscribers who use the Microsoft Sidekick dumb phone.

It’s small comfort that T-Mobile suspended the further sales of Microsoft’s Sidekick smart phone.”

 

 For the full article, click here!

Posted in Cloud Computing, Cloud Recovery | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Online backup or cloud recovery?

Posted by amcanty on October 5, 2009

by Ian Masters – Double-Take Software - Monday, 5 October 2009.

“Backing up files and data online has been around for quite a while, but it has never really taken off in a big way for business customers. There is also a new solution coming onto the market which uses “the cloud” for backup and recovery of company data. While these two approaches to disaster recovery appear to be similar, there are some significant differences as well. Which one would be right for you?

“Cloud recovery” can be a nebulous term, so I would define it based on the solution having the following features:

1. The ability to recover workloads in the cloud.

2. Effectively unlimited scalability with little or no up-front provisioning.

3. Pay-per-use billing model.

4. An infrastructure that is more secure and more reliable than the one you would build yourself.

5. Complete protection – i.e. non-expert users should be able to recover everything they need, by default.

If a solution does not meet up to these five criteria, then it should be called an online backup product. This may be right for your business, but typically they require more IT knowledge and are based on specific resources.

There is an old saying in the data protection business that the whole point of backing up is preparing to restore. Having a backup copy of your data is important, but it takes more than a pile of tapes (or an on-line account) to restore. You might need a replacement server, new storage, and maybe even a new data centre, depending on what went wrong.

Traditionally, you would either keep spare servers in a disaster recovery data centre, or suffer a period of downtime while you order and configure new equipment. With a cloud recovery solution, you don’t want just your data in the cloud, you want the ability to actually start up applications and use them, no matter what went wrong in your own environment.

The next area where cloud recovery can provide a better level of protection is around provisioning. Even using online backup systems, organizations would have to use replacement servers in the event of an outage. The whole point of recovering to the cloud is that they already have plenty of servers and additional capacity on tap. If you need more space to cope with a recovery incident, then you can add this to your account. Under this model, your costs are much lower than building the DR solution yourself, because you get the benefit of duplicating your environment without the upfront capital cost”

For the full article, click here!

Posted in Cloud Computing, Cloud Recovery | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Cloud Recovery Trends

Posted by amcanty on August 10, 2009

By Peter Laudenslager http://advice.cio.com/dbtk/cloud_recovery_trends

“Cloud computing means many things (Sun’s CTO rattled off at least six different perspectives), but almost all definitions include some key value propositions: scalable on-demand resources, a metered pay-per-use model, access over the Internet, and infrastructure management and optimization that is better than most data centers.
At a more conceptual level, cloud computing abstracts away all the undifferentiated IT tasks. Most businesses don’t add any value to their customers or create any competitive advantage for themselves when they buy, build, configure, and manage servers & storage. This is doubly true for disaster recovery equipment and data centers. Conversely, poor performance in these tasks can cost value and competitive advantage. There is no benefit in doing these tasks well, but there is cost to doing them badly. This is like the opposite of a financial call option – lots of downside risk, but no upside.”

Read the rest of the article here.

Posted in Cloud Computing, Cloud Providers, Cloud Recovery | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

The Intersection of Cloud and DR

Posted by Peter Laudenslager on July 2, 2009

I had my first exposure to VMWare in about 2000, when it was still a free desktop product, and if I remember correctly, the version number was below 1.0. Since then, I have watched it mature through several stages of acceptance. I saw my customers pronounce it fit for test / dev, (but not production), then certify it for disaster recovery, (but still not production), and eventually second tier production. Today I hear of people running their entire operation on virtualized servers. This trend is familiar to me from the Linux and even the PC adoption curve.

Today we see the same cycle repeating itself with Cloud Computing, especially Infrastructure as a Service solutions. Some say this approach is only good for test / dev, or second tier applications. I say it is inevitable that significant chunks of the world’s IT workload will happen in the cloud. Ten years ago, we were having this conversation about where to host the corporate web server. Today, almost nobody keeps their public web server in-house, because the quality, reliability, security, and cost is so much better from the specialized providers.

So the move to the cloud is inevitable, but that doesn’t mean you have to abandon your data center today. There are still kinks to work out, and those short-term kinks might be very good reasons why you cannnot, and should not move all your IT operations whole-hog into the cloud. But your DR operations seem like a slam-dunk for the cloud.

I have been in the DR business for over 11 years (not counting my years as an IT manager, struggling with, and typically failing at DR), and I am the first to admit that DR is a pain. The first half of this post argues that you will want to give your data center over to specialists, but disaster recovery planning tells you to go build a second data center! The second thing your DR plan calls for is a bunch of servers that you aren’t going to use, except in a disaster. And data centers full of servers require planning, investment, build-out, on-going operating costs, and then updates as equipment ages. All of that can be rented from the cloud, on a pay-per-use basis.

In the best case scenario, you can get access to the necessary infrastructure for no up-front investment, with little or no configuration / build-out time, but have access to nearly unlimited resources when the need arises. Best of all, you only pay for the capacity you actually use – you don’t generally pay for any of the stand-by capacity. Cloud computing can be a confusing jumble of too-good-to-be-true claims, but for disaster recovery, it looks like a perfect fit.

Posted in Business Continuity, Cloud Availability | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.